About 1,253 minutes
The pears of New York — Context and Discussion
Plants Soil
288,013 recorded words. 60 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #46994This digital edition of The plums of New York — A Reader’s Guide is described by source-level measurements including 274,203 words, 19 hr 53 min estimated reading time, and 46 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 15.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Plum,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 1,253 minutes
Plants Soil
288,013 recorded words. 60 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #46994About 1,027 minutes
Plants Soil
236,165 recorded words. 166 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #45978About 716 minutes
Plants Soil
164,508 recorded words. 477 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #46327Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-26. Coverage: 100 public books, 100 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
U. P. Hedrick’s The Plums of New York opens with a clear institutional purpose: it is the third fruit monograph from the New York Agricultural Experiment Station, following The Grapes of New York. The preface immediately establishes the book’s dual audience—written for New York but applicable “to the whole country and more or less to the world.” This tension between local specificity and general utility runs throughout the work. Hedrick positions the volume as a record of “present knowledge,” not a final statement, and acknowledges contributions from commercial growers alongside station research. The structure is methodical: historical and botanical classification first, then a discussion of plum-growing’s status, followed by detailed variety entries. Each entry includes synonymy, bibliography, and often a biographical footnote about the person who introduced or championed the variety.
The variety entries are notable for their exacting physical detail. For Sheldrake, the fruit is described as “one and one-half inches by one and three-eighths inches in size, roundish-oblong,” with a “cavity very deep, abrupt.” The stone is “dark-colored, semi-clinging, one inch by three-quarters inch in size, broadly ovate or irregularly oval, flattened, with roughened and granular surfaces.” Such measurements are not merely taxonomic; they serve the practical needs of growers comparing cultivars. The descriptions also include sensory judgments: Sheldrake’s flesh is “yellow, tender, sweet next the skin, but sour near the center, inferior in flavor.” This combination of objective dimension and subjective taste evaluation is a consistent pattern. For Shipper, the text notes that the flesh is “dry” and plums “often shrivel on the tree,” characters that “fit it for shipping” but make it “of little value after it reaches the market.” The entries thus balance utility against quality, often with blunt candor.
A striking feature of the book is the way it presents conflicting judgments among pomologists. In the entry for Sharp’s Emperor, the text quotes H. A. Pearson calling it “a second rate plum, resembling Victoria, in appearance, but very inferior in point of cropping and quality, a decided clingstone, often gumming at the stone, and ripening a fortnight later than its supposed synonym.” Yet August Royer described both varieties as freestones. The author weighs the evidence: “While there is a lack of uniformity in the descriptions yet the total evidence weighs in favor of two types which are very similar.” This willingness to acknowledge uncertainty and to let contradictory sources stand is unusual for a government bulletin. Similarly, for Shipper, the text admits that “some pomologists give a rather better estimate of the variety than that expressed here,” but maintains its own negative assessment. The book does not suppress dissent; it records it, then renders a verdict based on the station’s own trials.
Throughout the variety entries, the origins of plums are traced to individual discoverers, often amateurs. Sheldrake “originated as a chance seedling on the shore of Cayuga Lake near the town of Sheldrake, New York,” and was “discovered and propagated by J. T. Hunt of Kendaia.” Shipper was “found by Mr. H. S. Wiley in a private garden at Port Byron, New York, about 1877,” and the original grower “thought that it came from a stone of one of the several varieties in his garden.” These origin stories are brief but recurrent, highlighting the role of local observation and luck in creating new cultivars. The footnotes, as the preface explains, contain “biographical sketches of the persons who have contributed most to plum culture in America.” This attention to individual contributors—nurserymen, farmers, experimenters—gives the book a human dimension alongside its scientific rigor. The reader is reminded that the catalog of varieties is not just a list of names but a record of generations of practical horticulture.
Readers approaching The Plums of New York will find it most useful as a reference to be consulted variety by variety rather than read straight through. The footnotes and synonymy lists reward browsing, revealing how names shifted and how knowledge accumulated. The book’s value lies not in any overarching argument but in the density of its observations—each entry a small case study in the interplay of climate, cultivation, and chance. For those interested in the history of American pomology, it offers a snapshot of how state agricultural science operated in the early twentieth century: systematic, collaborative, and grounded in the practical needs of growers.
The rain blurred the window while I traced Hedrick’s measured notes on plum flesh and pit, the patient record of vanished orchards. That same quiet devotion to cultivating living shapes surfaced later, unbidden, when I picked up The book of topiary — Story, Setting & Ideas. It felt less like a departure than a turn in a familiar garden path, one green discipline folding into another.
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.